Assessing the Effectiveness of Graduate School Instruction in a State University: Guide to Enhanced Andragogical Teaching
Main Article Content
Abstract
Quality instruction in graduate education is imperative for developing productive citizens capable of assuming community leadership roles. To ensure institutional delivery meets these expectations, this study evaluated instructional effectiveness through the lens of Malcolm Knowles’ Andragogical (adult learning) theory, which emphasizes learner autonomy, experience, and relevance. Utilizing a descriptive survey design, data were collected from 11 Doctor of Education (EdD) students, representing a complete program census. Findings revealed that adult learners perceive instruction as highly effective when strategies are interactive, collaborative, and foster higher-order thinking, such as brainstorming and multidisciplinary approaches. Experiential methods, including case analysis, role-playing, and simulations, were deemed effective but require deliberate instructional scaffolding to maximize their potential. Furthermore, respondents emphasized a strong preference for practical, output-based applications and modality-appropriate instruction. Based on these findings, the study proposes a four-pillar "Guide for Enhanced Andragogical Teaching." This framework provides actionable guidelines to help higher education institutions transition from traditional, lecture-based pedagogy to adult-centered, collaborative learning environments, thereby optimizing instructional delivery for graduate students.


